Losing Touch

I showed up at my first dress rehearsal as a member of “The World of Mime,” my high school’s mime troupe, wearing the requisite costume: black turtleneck shirt, black tights, black ballet slippers. Mr. Lawrence, the drama teacher who led the troupe, asked me whether I was wearing a dance belt.

“What’s a dance belt?” I asked.

“It’s like a heavy-duty jockstrap,” he said. “What do you have on under there?”

“Just underpants,” I said uneasily. I didn’t mention that I had carefully dyed my tighty-whities black so they wouldn’t show through the tights.

“Beth! Ruth!” he called out to two veteran members of the troupe. (Ruth’s full name was actually Ruth Ann, but she’d resigned herself to being known simply as Ruth.) “Take him to the Capezio store and get him a dance belt!”

Ruth Ann was a senior, and thus had a car. Beth, a junior, was there for moral support. We were already friends, having worked on several shows together. I was totally comfortable with them, especially with Ruth Ann. She was warm and empathetic, the kind of person who would take your hand when she was talking with you. She and I both wrote songs, but hers were lovely, slow, and pensive, while mine were fast and funny. Each of us envied the other’s writing style. We once got to collaborate on a song for a musical, and the experience was an awakening — I’d never felt so totally embraced by another person. I was secretly, totally in love with Ruth Ann.

After a 15-minute drive, we walked into the dancewear store, and I approached the clerk at the counter. “I’d like to get a dance belt,” I said.

The clerk politely replied, “What size?”

I turned bright red. Both Beth and Ruth Ann literally doubled over in laughter. I stared at the clerk, not knowing what an appropriate answer would be. I eventually choked out, “Um, what sizes do they come in?”

Ruth Ann and Beth were laughing so hard that they could no longer make any sounds come out. “They go by waist size,” said the clerk.

Why do I remember this incident so warmly, instead of as a humiliating or traumatizing experience? I think it’s because — to dredge up a cliché for which I can’t find an apt alternative — Beth and Ruth Ann were laughing with me, not at me. We were totally comfortable with each other. We were theater people.

Theater people habitually touched, hugged, and emoted. Any of us could get on stage and be completely vulnerable, and it would be OK, because all of us had done it. And I’m sure that this capacity to be vulnerable grew out of the bond that comes from physical touch. This was a way of relating to people that I never knew was possible until I fell in with the drama crowd in high school.

The kind of contact that I came to value so much — my crush on Ruth Ann notwithstanding — wasn’t romantic, and it wasn’t sexual. It was pure warmth and trust, and it crossed gender lines. I remember rehearsing for a touring production of “The Wizard of Oz,” when I (as the Tin Man) and my friend Howie (as the Cowardly Lion) were being threatened by the Wicked Witch of the West. When the witch turned to me, I jumped into Howie’s arms. And when the witch turned to him, we immediately switched positions, with Howie jumping into my arms. It wasn’t planned; it just happened — a product of our being so tuned into and familiar with each other. The bit stayed in the show, and remained was one of my favorite moments.

After Ruth Ann graduated, the go-to person for transportation was a senior named Diane, who had a little red Volkswagen Beetle. There was one night — I wish I could remember where we were going — when nine of us squeezed into Diane’s car. Putting aside that most people of my generation are significantly larger than we were in high school, I can’t imagine anything like that happening today. I have a tendency to hug my friends, and a few of them are especially good huggers in return, but it doesn’t come close to the degree of ease and physical comfort that I had with my drama friends in school. It’s likely that I’ll never be in an environment like that again. What a loss.

Read Me 2 comments

All In My Head

One damp winter night when I was eight years old, our family doctor pulled up to our house, accompanied by his black leather bag. My mother had called him in a panic because I had suddenly become nearly unable to breathe. The doctor, after examining me and questioning my mother, determined that what I was experiencing was severe asthma, triggered by an aspirin tablet I’d taken earlier that evening. I was, it turned out, allergic to aspirin.

My allergy to aspirin became a permanent part of my medical profile. Many times as an adult, long after I’d outgrown my various other childhood allergies, I would occasionally ask my current doctor whether it might make sense to try taking aspirin and see whether I still had an adverse reaction. “Why take a chance?” the doctor would always say.

Not being able to take aspirin is hardly a liability these days. Aspirin has largely fallen out of favor, with ibuprofen and acetaminophen becoming the everyday painkillers of choice. But in the early 1960s, aspirin was still the thing that everyone used to relieve discomfort. (The cliché doctor’s advice “Take two aspirin and call me in the morning” dates from that era.) If aspirin was out of the picture, what was I supposed to take instead when I was sick?

It turned out that a little-known drug called Tylenol had recently become available over the counter. It wasn’t yet being widely marketed, but doctors knew about it. Tylenol was meant to be a substitute for aspirin, but generally only for people like me for whom taking aspirin was a problem. My family’s medicine cabinet remained stocked with aspirin, but soon it was accompanied by a small bottle of Tylenol for my exclusive use. Whenever I had a headache, that’s what I would turn to.

The problem was that I had a lot of headaches, and that made my mother angry. My job was to be a happy, well-adjusted kid, and happy kids aren’t supposed to get headaches. If I was so stressed out as to have tension headaches all the time, she insisted, I must be doing something wrong. But the fact is that in struggling to live up to expectations at home and at school, I was stressed. If I could have taken aspirin when my head hurt, nobody would have noticed that the number of tablets was slightly reduced. But because I was taking Tylenol, it was clear who was to blame when the supply ran out.

“More headaches?!” my mother would snap when I asked her to buy a new bottle of Tylenol. She would insist on only buying a small bottle, perhaps under the assumption that limiting the supply would limit the frequency of my headaches. But that only meant that I had to ask her more frequently to buy another bottle, which did nothing to limit my stress level.

Recent studies have suggested that acetaminophen — i.e., Tylenol — is a more effective analgesic than aspirin, and that ibuprofen (which wasn’t generally available until the 1980s) is more effective still. But in the 1960s and early ’70s, aspirin was still king, and it was my firm conviction that Tylenol wasn’t nearly as effective at relieving my headaches as the “good stuff” had been. I therefore had the consolation of being able to luxuriate in my victimhood.

I don’t mean to imply that I was suffering badly. These were mere tension headaches — not migraines, which I understand to be a hundred times worse. As I got older and gained more control over my life, my head ached much less often, and since I was self-employed and had a flexible schedule, I could usually go take a nap with the assurance that, with or without Tylenol, the headache would probably be gone when I woke up.

It was only when I began my teaching career in my 40s that I had to start thinking again about headaches. I remember the first time a headache cropped up when I was scheduled to teach a class, and I suddenly realized that no matter what my state of discomfort, I still had to teach the damn class. Something about that struck me as profoundly unfair. Why should my job require me to do something that my body was clearly objecting to?

That’s when I realized how extraordinarily privileged I was. For most of human history, people’s work and their bodies were inextricably linked. For me to be able to draw a conceptual line, with my work on one side and my body on the other, was an unprecedented state of affairs. And even now, most people’s occupations require them to interact with the hard, dirty physical world rather than with abstract information. Miners still have to mine, and maintenance workers still have to maintain, even if they’re experiencing physical discomfort; and more to the point, the work itself takes a toll on their physical well-being.

A friend of mine is a contractor who has done all of the remodeling, repair, and maintenance on our home for the past 25 years. He’s my age, but his body has nearly given out; he can’t accomplish much without the help of a younger assistant. He’s struggling to figure out what his place is in the world. I, meanwhile, continue to sit at my computer, doing the same work (if “work” is the appropriate term) that I’ve done all my life. I’ve done nothing to deserve that advantaged outcome. If I still get an occasional headache, what right have I to complain?

Read Me 1 comment

Passé

It’s been fascinating to track the changes in societal attitudes toward COVID over the past (nearly) three years. At the beginning of the pandemic, the message from public health experts was: You’re going to get COVID. Everybody’s going to get it. We just have to make sure that everybody doesn’t get it at the same time, so as to avoid overwhelming the health care system. That was the idea behind “flattening the curve” (a phrase that now has a fairly quaint ring to it, like “surfing the web”).

Then came the sudden, miraculous appearance of the Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson vaccines, which changed the prevailing wisdom to: Nobody has to get COVID, as long as we all stay current on our vaccinations.

Eventually the emergence of Omicron and its many rapidly evolving subvariants brought us back to: Well, it turns out you’re going to get COVID after all. But so long as you’re vaccinated (and boosted), it’s not going to kill you.

Now, so far as I can tell, the general attitude of both the government and the public is: Yeah, OK, whatever.

At least that’s my impression here in the UK, where Debra and I celebrated the third week of our two-month stay in London by contracting a juicy, joint case of COVID. (I can’t say that I’m surprised, given that nobody — and I mean nobody — wears masks here. As much as we’re trying to live like average Londoners, when we put on our KN-95s while riding in a crowded Underground train, we immediately and blatantly label ourselves as outsiders.)

As soon as we saw the positive results of our antigen tests, we went online to find out what resources were available for us. The National Health Service fortunately has lots of easy-to-find information on the subject, which can pretty much be summarized as “COVID — is that still a thing?”

I’m not kidding. It’s fortunate that we brought our own supply of COVID tests from home, because they’re difficult to come by here. The NHS offers free COVID testing to people who have serious health conditions, who are being admitted to a hospital, or who work in social services. According to the NHS website, if you’re not in any of those categories, then “you’re no longer advised to get tested.”

And what happens if you do get your hands on a test, and it turns up positive? The NHS’s advice is “Try to” — and yes, it actually does say “try to” — “stay at home and avoid contact with other people for 5 days.” That’s basically it.

So we’ve been self-isolating in our basement flat since Sunday, depending on food-delivery services to keep our refrigerator stocked. (My favorite of the UK delivery services is Deliveroo, whose slogan is, “Food — we get it!”) Not that either of us has had much of an appetite. To confirm our positive test results, we went through the list of COVID symptoms, and found that we both had textbook cases: “Fever, yup. Coughing, yup. Shortness of breath or difficulty breathing, yup. Muscle or body aches, headache, sore throat, congestion or runny nose — yuppity yuppity yup.…” Fortunately, one symptom that we haven’t experienced is loss of taste or smell. Which brings me to the bright note on which I’d like to end this post: peri-peri chicken!

Peri-peri (sometimes spelled piri-piri) is a South African hot-pepper sauce that we first encountered during our visit to Cape Town ten years ago. I thought that peri-peri chicken was strictly a South African specialty, but for some reason, every chicken joint here in London seems to offer it. Even during my first few days of COVID, when I had no desire for food at all, finding some leftover peri-peri chicken in the fridge was enough to revive my appetite, to the point where I immediately devoured half a bird. The flavor is irresistible, and the spiciness cuts through all of that COVID-induced congestion. I was brought up to trust that chicken soup is the cure for everything, but clearly my Jewish relatives had never been to South Africa, or London.

Read Me 2 comments

Death-Defying

A few years ago, I died in a dream.

Back when I was growing up, that was considered to be impossible. The common wisdom was that if you died in a dream, you’d never wake up — dream death equaled real death. (It never occurred to me at the time that there was no way to verify that claim empirically.) Sure enough, for most of my life, I could dream of almost dying, but never of actually crossing the threshold.

In real life, I’ve had several experiences of narrowly avoiding death, and so have many people I’ve talked to. Given how common that experience seems to be, it’s amazing how many of us are still alive.

My most vivid memory of not dying comes from a family trip to Washington, DC when I was eleven years old. It was my first experience of traveling far from home, and I was in a constant state of excitement. (This was back before the federal government had taken on its unshakeable aura of sleaze, when seeing the Washington Monument and the Lincoln Memorial for the first time could be genuinely awe-inspiring.) As we strolled past several blocks of gleaming government buildings, I could barely contain my energy. There was a series of low, white retaining walls that separated the buildings’ sloping lawns from the sidewalk, and I jumped onto each one and strode along it balance-beam style, with my arms out to the sides.

At one point I came to a wall that was just like the others, except that it had a squat metal railing down the middle. I jumped up on it and tried to keep up the pace, but the railing made it difficult to get my footing. As I glanced briefly to my right, I discovered why this wall was different from the others: We were on a highway overpass, with six lanes of traffic racing below, and I was balancing on its very edge.

I gasped and immediately jumped to my left, down onto the sidewalk. My parents, still walking, had no idea that anything had happened. But that glimpse of the highway below me — still burned into my memory today — remained horrifying. I realized how close I had just come to catastrophe.

I didn’t find out on that day what it felt like to die, and assumed that I would never find out until the moment actually came. But then, not too long ago, I had this dream.

In my dream, rather than balancing on the edge of an overpass, I was lying in bed, dozing. There were other people in the room, quietly moving about. Suddenly everything froze — time itself seemed to stop. Although no omniscient voice told me so, I immediately understood that my life was about to end. I’d been granted this pause so that I could adjust to the idea and prepare myself. The pause would last for as long as I needed it to.

When I felt that I was ready, I shifted in the bed. That motion was enough to end the pause and start time flowing again. Surprisingly quickly, I (my consciousness?) left my body and started hurtling away. I started to cry out, but the voice wasn’t coming from “me”; it was coming from my body, which was rapidly vanishing into the distance. I was simultaneously frightened and exhilarated, watching the world I’d known shrink down to a pinpoint and then disappear.

I wish I could say that this is where the dream ended. In the absence of any actual experience, if I ever ask myself what dying is like, this scenario seems as real and believable as any. The preparatory pause certainly seems like something that a benevolent universe would bestow.

Unfortunately, the dream concluded on an unexpectedly sour note. There “I” was, disembodied, surrounded by blackness, alone in an empty universe. I immediately knew that this couldn’t be real. If I were truly dead, there would be no “me” left to have this experience — either my consciousness would come to an end, or it would merge into the rest of existence and become part of a whole. Clearly, this couldn’t really be death; someone must be playing a trick on me.

Faced with this disappointing realization, I did the logical thing: I woke up. I still like to say that I died in this dream, thus refuting my childhood belief that one can’t; but it will be quite some time (let us hope) before I know for sure.

Read Me 2 comments

Impossible

Many years ago, I met a woman on a train who told me that she worked in a plastics factory. When I asked her what the factory made, she said that one half of it manufactured the little plastic cups that come with NyQuil bottles, and the other half manufactured dolls’ eyes.[1]

Naturally, I’ve always remembered that conversation — who could forget the juxtaposition of NyQuil cups and dolls’ eyes? But I remember it also because it started me thinking about the sheer number of things that exist in the world, and where they must come from. Every product must be manufactured in a factory somewhere, and in many of those cases (as with NyQuil cups and dolls’ eyes), the parts that make up those products must be made somewhere else. Add to that the number of factories that must make the machinery that makes the parts in the aforementioned factories, and the factories that make the parts for those machines. In sum, for the world to have enough factories to turn out the hundreds of millions of different products that are used in homes and businesses is, quite plainly, impossible. And yet — as is hardly necessary to point out — it does. Clearly, I’m not I’m not the best judge of what’s possible and what’s not.

I must confess that I have a long history of limited imagination. My first computer came with a rudimentary spell-checker that would go through a document and check it against a limited list of frequently misspelled words. I remember thinking that, given enough floppy disks, it was theoretically possible for the spell-checker to contain a full dictionary, possibly even with definitions. But of course I knew that would never happen, because who was going to type an entire unabridged dictionary into a computer?

A few years later, my friend Brad, an early tech visionary, showed me a model he had come up with for software that would enable numerous members of a team to work together on a project. While I admired the model’s elegance, I told him that it would never work in the real world, because human nature made it impossible for more than a couple of people to collaborate on anything.

My then-girlfriend Marcia, who at the time worked for the pioneering spreadsheet company Lotus, gave me a chance to try out one of the first-generation Macintosh computers. I concluded that its visually oriented, mouse-based interface made it an expensive toy that would never be useful for any serious work. Who would have the patience to keep looking for things to click on, instead of simply telling the computer what to do?

There’s an old myth that the laws of aviation make it impossible for bees to fly, and yet they do so anyway. If that were true (which it isn’t), the lesson should be that there’s something wrong with the commonly accepted laws of aviation — not that there’s something miraculous about the bee. But I was one of those people who, when something I considered impossible actually came about, refused to accept that my conception of the universe might be wrong.

Surprisingly — or perhaps not surprisingly, given my tendency to learn kinesthetically — my first opportunity to see beyond that blinkered worldview came not in a computer lab, but at a rock-climbing gym. Although I’ve always resisted doing anything athletic, a friend named Bonnie, who was as smart and analytic as anyone I’ve ever met, convinced me that making my way up a climbing wall would present a mental challenge as much as a physical one. And sure enough, as I learned to navigate the route upward, I found that strategizing about where next to place my hand or my foot paid off rewardingly each time I found a secure hold.

Except for the time when I didn’t. I was midway up the wall and I couldn’t find anything to grab or step onto that would allow me to move ahead. After long consideration, I had to admit defeat. “This is impossible,” I said to Bonnie.

“Don’t think; just go for it!” was her unexpected response. Given that Bonnie was gripping a rope that assured my safety, I had nothing to lose but my dignity, so I did something I could never have imagined doing: I leapt upward and trusted that my body would find some way to hold on. And it did!

I still don’t know how I was able to latch onto that wall, but it was suddenly clear that my belief that something was impossible didn’t make it so. That’s a lesson that has stayed with me ever since. The expression “leap of faith” holds a very concrete meaning for me.

Of course, I don’t know for sure that if I’d worked at Google when someone said, “Let’s map every street in the world and make those maps available for free on everybody’s phone,” I wouldn’t have used the I-word. But I like to think that some small piece of my imagination would have marveled at the possibility.


[1] Seeing how this looks when written down, I wouldn’t blame you for thinking that she was putting me on. But I swear that she was entirely earnest.

Read Me 1 comment